تحلیل محتوای کتاب‌های تفکر و سبک زندگی دوره اول متوسطه حرفه‌ای دانش‌آموزان با نیازهای ویژه بر اساس مؤلفه‌های تنظیم هیجان

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه آموزش روانشناسی و مشاوره، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران

2 گروه آموزش علوم تربیتی،دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران ایران

چکیده

تنظیم هیجان به‌مثابه فرآیندی تعریف شده است که افراد می‌توانند به‌وسیله آن ماهیت، سیر و بیان هیجان‌ها را شناسایی، ارزیابی و تحت تأثیر قرار دهند. افراد دارای ناتوانی ذهنی مشکلاتی را در تنظیم هیجان تجربه می‌کنند. بر این اساس، هدف پژوهش حاضر، تحلیل محتوای آموزش کتاب‌های تفکر و سبک زندگی دوره اول متوسطه حرفه‌ای بر اساس مؤلفه‌های تنظیم هیجان بود. این پژوهش توصیفی و از نوع تحلیل محتوا بود. جامعه آماری این پژوهش، کتاب‌های تفکر و سبک زندگی پایه‌های هفتم، هشتم و نهم دوره اول متوسطه حرفه‌ای (۳ جلد کتاب) در سال تحصیلی ۱۴۰۱- ۱۴۰۰ بود. ابزار پژوهش شامل چک‌لیست تهیه‌شده بر اساس مدل فرآیندی تنظیم هیجان گراس بود. برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها از روش آنتروپی شانون استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که مؤلفة مربوط به اصلاح موقعیت با ۳۴ مورد بیشترین فراوانی و گسترش توجه با ۷ مورد کمترین فراوانی را دارد. بیشترین ضریب اهمیت در بین مؤلفه‌های تنظیم هیجان، مربوط به اصلاح موقعیت با مقدار (۳۶/۰) و کمترین ضریب اهمیت به گسترش توجه با مقدار (۰۶/۰) بود. بر این اساس می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که به‌طور کلی به تنظیم هیجان در کتاب‌های تفکر و سبک زندگی دوره اول متوسطه حرفه‌ای کمتر توجه شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Content Analysis of the Book Thought and Lifestyle Based on Components of Emotion Regulation for Students with Special Needs in the Vocational Secondary Schools

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Eghbali 1
  • mohammad azimi 2
1 Department of Psychology and Counselling, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Educational Sciences ,Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Emotion regulation is defined as a process through which individuals can identify, assess, and affect the nature, direction, and expression of emotions. Mentally impaired individuals experience some difficulties in emotion regulation. With this issue in mind, the present research aimed at conducting a content analysis of the book Thought and Lifestyle in secondary schools based on the components of emotion regulation. The statistical population of this descriptive study was the three volumes of the above mentioned book for the students of seventh, eighth, and ninth degrees in secondary schools in the school year 2021-2022. The research instrument was a checklist provided on the basis of Gross’s process model of emotion regulation. To analyze the data, Shannon’s entropy method was used. The results showed that the component related to the situation modification was most frequent (with 34 occurrences) and attentional deployment was the least frequent (with 7 occurrences). The highest impact factor among components of emotion regulation belonged to situation modification (0.36), and the lowest to attentional deployment (0.06). Accordingly, it could be concluded that by and large emotion regulation has been relatively neglected in the book Thought and Lifestyle in vocational secondary schools.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • emotion regulation
  • vocational secondary school
  • students with special needs
  • mental disability
  1. سازمان آموزش‌وپرورش استثنایی کشور. ۱۳۹۷. آیین‌نامه آموزشی دوره اول متوسطه حرفه‌ای دانش‌آموزان با نیاز ویژه، تهران.
  2. American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth edition). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  3. Aldao, A., Sheppes, G., and Gross, J. J. 2015. Emotion regulation flexibility. Cognitive Therapy and Research 39: 263–278.
  4. Benson, B. A., and Fuchs, C. 1999. Anger arousing situations and coping responses of aggressive adults with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 24(3): 207–214.
  5. Bonanno, G. A., and Burton, C. L. 2014. Regulatory flexibility: an individual differences perspective on coping and emotion regulation. Psychological Science 8: 591–612.
  6. Bridgett, D. J., Burt, N. M., Edwards, E. S., and Deater-Deckard, K. 2015. Intergenerational transmission of self-regulation: A multidisciplinary review and integrative conceptual framework. Psychological bulletin 141(3): 602.
  7. Carnazzo, K., Dowdy, E., Furlong, M. J., and Quirk, M. P. 2019. An evaluation of the social emotional health survey—secondary for use with students with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools 56(3): 433–446.
  8. Cavioni, V., Grazzani, I., and Ornaghi, V. 2017. Social and emotional learning for children with learning disability: Implications for inclusion. International Journal of Emotional Education 9(2): 100-109.
  9. Dusenbury, L., and Weissberg, R. P. 2017. Social emotional learning in elementary school: Preparation for success. The Education Digest 83(1): 36–43.
  10. Feuerborn, L., and Tyre, A. 2009. Practical social-emotional learning tools for students with specific learning disabilities in the United States of America. Journal of the International Association of Special Education 10(1): 21-25.
  11. Greenaway, K. H., Kalokerinos, E. K., Hinton, S., and Hawkins, G. E. 2021. Emotion experience and expression goals shape emotion regulation strategy choice. Emotion 21(7): 1452–1469.
  12. Gross, J. J. 2015. Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry 26(1): 1-26.
  13. Hartley, C.A., and Phelps, E.A. 2010. Changing Fear: The Neurocircuitry of Emotion Regulation. Neuropsychopharmacology Reviews 35: 136–146.
  14. Houck, C.D., Hadley, W., Barker, D.H., Brown, L.K, Hancock, E., and Almy, B. 2016. An emotion regulation intervention to reduce risk behaviors among at-risk early adolescents. Prevention Science 17: 71–82.
  15. Jarymowicz, M., and Imbir, K. 2015. Toward a human emotions taxonomy (based on their automatic vs. Reflective origin). Emotion Review 7: 183–188.
  16. Koole, S. L., Webb, T. L., and Sheeran, P. L. 2015. Implicit emotion regulation: feeling better without knowing why. Current Opinion in Psychology 3: 6–10.
  17. Kryszewska, H. 2017. Teaching Students with Special Needs in Inclusive Classrooms Special Educational Needs. ELT Journal 71(4): 525–528.
  18. Lichtenfeld, S., Maier, M.A., Buechner, V.L., and Fernández-Capo, M. 2019. The Influence of Decisional and Emotional Forgiveness on Attributions. Frontiers in Psychology 10: 1-10.
  19. Lindsay, W.R., Michie, A.M., Baty, F.J., Smith, A.H.W., and Miller, S. 2008. The consistency of reports about feelings and emotions from people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 38(1): 61-6.
  20. McKenzie K, Murray G, Murray A. et al. 2019. Emotion recognition and processing style in children with an intellectual disability. Learning Disability Practice 22(3): 20-24.
  21. Melville CA, Johnson PCD, Smiley E, Simpson N, Purves D, McConnachie A, et al. 2016. Problem behaviours and symptom dimensions of psychiatric disorders in adults with intellectual disabilities: an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Research in Developmental Disabilities 55: 1-13.
  22. Moore, D.G. 2001. Reassessing emotion recognition performance in people with mental retardation: A review. American Journal on Mental Retardation 106(6): 481–502.
  23. Tamir, M., and Millgram, Y. 2017. Motivated emotion regulation: Principles, lessons, and implications of a motivational analysis of emotion regulation. In A. J. Elliot, Ed., Advances in Motivation Science, pp. 207-247.
  24. Taylor, B.K. 2015. Content, Process, and Product: Modeling Differentiated Instruction. Kappa Delta Pi Record 51(1): 13-7.
  25. Van Beveren, M.L., Goossens, L., Volkaert, B., Grassmann, C., Wante, L., Vandeweghe, L.,Verbeken, S., and Braet, C. 2019. How do I feel right now? Emotional awareness, emotion regulation, and depressive symptoms in youth. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 28(3): 389–398.
  26. Zulfah, R.H., Wijiastuti, A., and Sartinah, E.S. 2020. The Implementation of the Emotion Regulation Therapy for Students with Intellectual Disabilities. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 491: 115-119.